nunodonato 2 days ago | next |

Funny how these sort of solutions come up. I never understood the tab problem, I don't even use extensions to manage tabs, group tabs, or whatever. I like to keep my work focused, so apart from the 4-5 tabs I keep permanently open due to convenience (email, tasks, calendar, etc), I rarely have more than 3-4 others of stuff I'm working/researching. When its done, I close them. If I need them, I either bookmark or save the content.

blixt 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

My partner has ~300 tabs open at any point in time in Safari for iOS and uses the tab grid as a kind of visual registry of things to read, interesting events/restaurants, in-progress work, etc. It makes me panic looking at it but I think it isn't my place to say that it's a problem.

Basically there's two ways to deal with an emergent user behavior: see it as a problem to control (make people use bookmarks instead), or embrace it as the path of least friction for the user and actually encourage it more, and make it easier, and more robust (Safari sometimes loses all tabs which is obviously a catastrophe for my partner).

Then the remaining question is, can a single product solve both user behaviors? Or do you need a new product to solve for the second behavior? And maybe that's a great reason for a solution like this to come up.

dspillett 2 days ago | root | parent |

> My partner has ~300 tabs open at any point in time

I'm like this, though more so. I have hundreds of tabs open on my main desktop, a few tens on my laptop, and [deity] knows how many “open” on my phone. It is an effect of my disorganised thinking: I flit to something else and leave the tabs open for when I get back to this train of thought. Sometimes I spend some time going through them, discarding old ones that are unlikely to ever be relevant, collecting others into notes elsewhere (usually the bunch of text files I maintain for ideas/project/etc, bookmarks don't cut it with or without extensions) and leaving the rest for the next cleanup session once I get bored with the review process.

I really need to sort a proper note taking/keeping process and stop working this way though, the browser isn't the right place for it beyond the short term. I've tried various ways (extensions and such) to help with organising tabs, but none have worked any better for me in the end (the more complex ones just end up adding a level of extra work to reorganising later). Horse looks interesting, like an extension I've tried and liked but that extension had too many rough edges, though I'm not paying $20 just to try it!

As well as the organisation aspect, the other reason I want to get this sort of state management out of the browser is that all that state is locking me in a bit. Moving to a different browser doesn't solve that, I don't want to just import it all wholesale into a new one because that'll solve nothing in the backlog and I'll just do it again at later date. Chrome losing some windows occasionally after an update, or a couple of times in recent months after falling over (at least twice something in a facebook tab seems to have killed it, then when restarting that window, all the tabs in it, and some tabs/windows that were opened from facebook, don't get restored) has been a useful push towards finally making some effort to move to Firefox, but again I really want to go back to using the browser as a browser and managing research/work state elsewhere. I now have tens of tabs open in FF as well as the great many in Chrome…

Basically: I think I have an illness and tabs are enabling it :)

> Then the remaining question is, can a single product solve both user behaviors?

Probably not, the complexity required for one set of behaviours just makes it burdensome for those with simpler needs, so trying to solve both problems leads the app to needing to support to distinct but related feature sets. Especially for people like me who have multiple devices and don't want to simply sync the state between them for various reasons.

The extension model sort-of works better for this: let the main app deal with the basic needs most users have, and extensions deal with those of us who want/need something more. If only there were extensions that worked exactly the way I need/want (that there are so many options, and none of them look ideal to everyone so more are popping up all the time, tells you how varied the needs/desires are amongst people).

> Or do you need a new product to solve for the second behavior?

I think the issue is that the browser isn't the right place for this much context. It should (IMO) be how you look at the information, not how you organise it. Like my TV views my media archive via Kodi, but I organise it elsewhere (on the PC/laptop). But it is so convenient to leave a little context in tabs/windows/history, and you only discover how inconvenient it eventually becomes once you are deep into the rabbit hole.

spinningarrow 2 days ago | root | parent | prev | next |

I don’t have a problem != no one has a problem

EDIT: I have no tab management issues either, and my workflow is quite similar to what’s described above. But I’ve seen many people who have different needs.

vdvsvwvwvwvwv 2 days ago | root | parent | prev |

Today I used splunk. It can take a while for things to load and more than 1 query is useful so tabs = literal caches. But also tabs = wetware caches, to help remember context. A tab group saves which is useful for projects that spans > 1 day.

joelkoen 2 days ago | prev | next |

You can achieve the exact same thing in Firefox using the Sidebery extension: https://github.com/mbnuqw/sidebery

nickthegreek 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

I love sidebery but I don’t remember how I originally set it up. I believe I was in some manifest files doing some css tweaks awhile ago. So my biggest issue now is how do I replicate my current bespoke setup on my other systems. Anyone know of any tools to assist?

elashri 2 days ago | prev | next |

I do work in physics research so I open on average 20-30 arxiv and research papers per any session. This is combined with the usual searches for SO and docs (looking at you CUDA docs) which would be a lot of tabs for any gives session.

I used Firefox developer edition (it was better performance that vanilla Firefox for my m1 mac and this is just a feeling not backed up with any data) and now is using zen browser. It is a huge upgrade, now I have workspaces, split tabs and vertical tabs. All while still using Firefox and ublock origin.

I think this made tabs management good experience but ths most important factor is that I trained myself to really hate having tabs that I don't know which means that once I get past 10 tabs that browser starts to hide some information I got annoyed and then go close some.

But I really feel like zen browser is everything I want in a browser so far. I tried arc which is close but it is chromium based and it is resource monster and also closed source and required account to use.

One other useful thing is that once I got used to use my selfhosted linkding to actually bookmark things I want to explore, this helped with the tendency to use open tabs as things to read later.

TomK32 2 days ago | root | parent |

A simple 1L machine with portainer on it and connected by wireguard is what I run my self-hosted stuff at home. Five minutes later I have my own linkding. Thanks for the tip.

TomK32 2 days ago | root | parent |

When importing existing Firefox bookmarks make sure to export those into the html file as linkding won't process the json backup file that Firefox can produce.

TomK32 2 days ago | root | parent |

It won't do anything with the folders though. That's a pitty. I love putting my bookmarks into folders.

elashri 2 days ago | root | parent |

I am not sure if this still works but this python script [1] helped me when I moved bookmarks from Firefox to linkding long time ago. It converted folders to tags. Linkding doesn't have folders concept and rely on tabs.

[1] https://github.com/ulixxe/Netscape-Bookmark-File-Parser

TomK32 a day ago | root | parent |

Yeah, read a github issue on the topic, looks like this won't change. Tag with some spacer like `:` would be great, but the app would have to treat them differently from regular tags to be useful to me. Or maybe I'll make a pull request :-)

Arech 2 days ago | prev | next |

Firefox + Simple Tab Groups addon is all you need.

Seriously, a browser is much more than just another program. It has become a foundation of lots of computer interaction experiences, and therefore requirements to it, especially to its security, are super high. I wouldn't expect "professionals" understanding all of this would want to ditch vendors they trust just because they can't keep up with tabs... Never had this problem since I discovered Simple Tab Groups, btw...

danpalmer 2 days ago | prev | next |

Interesting that they chose Electron. Cross platform is certainly enticing, but at this point I'd say that browsers are relatively heavyweight pieces of software that require careful optimisation to do well, even assuming you outsource the engine.

konaraddi 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

If true, horse browser devs need to read the Security section on Electron docs:

> With that in mind, be aware that displaying arbitrary content from untrusted sources poses a severe security risk that Electron is not intended to handle.

https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/tutorial/security#pre...

I feel like they should’ve used Chromium.

chaxor 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

Of anyone is making a browser in todays age, I would imagine starting with something like Servo would be best. There are far too many chromium based browsers.

A very minimal Rust-only browser with security and privacy in mind at every single step is completely missing from browsers today. Things like waterfox et al are enormous projects that take far too long for one person to audit the entire code base to ensure correctness. Something like the 'wireguard of browsers' in this regard is needed (single repo that one person can read over in a day and can be built with a single cargo build command). Even servo unfortunately falls just barely shy of this goal, but one can dream.

danpalmer 2 days ago | root | parent | prev | next |

Ah so I think they embed Chromium separately to run the browser views. I don't believe they are rendering any web content, just that all the browser chrome (sorry, overloaded term) is in Electron.

andai 2 days ago | root | parent | prev | next |

I think Vivaldi (similar concept, though I haven't tried Horse yet) is also built with Electron. I discovered this because I found it frustratingly slow (the new tab page had a loading spinner!) and found out they made the UI in JavaScript.

It's a shame because I really liked the flexibility (I was a big fan of Opera back in the day), but since new tab is something I do thousands of times per day, that small lag was enough to make it a non-starter.

NetOpWibby 2 days ago | prev | next |

I bought a lifetime license to Horse a while ago but haven’t really used it until recently (Arc is my main).

It’s pretty good, opinionated, but it doesn’t support extensions. The built-in ad blocker is okay but Privacy Badger and uBlock Origin are my winning combo in mainstream browsers. I also use Raindrop in a regular basis so until Horse at least supports those three extensions, it won’t be my main browser.

spondyl 2 days ago | root | parent |

I don't use it myself but I came across this open stats page which seems to suggest Chrome Extension Support is coupled to hitting $10K MRR.

The graph legend says

> To comfortably maintain our own build pipeline with Chrome Extension Support.

hakunin 2 days ago | prev | next |

I remember reading this jwz post[1] in 2012 where he said he never uses tabs at all, and realizing that I can use a combination of windows and tabs. So now I just have each window contain a bunch of tabs for one topic. If it's WIP, the window stays open or minimized, if it's a long term thing, I convert it to Safari's tab group. Not sure why more people don't use multiple windows, it's way more convenient than just having hundreds of tabs in one window.

[1]: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2012/04/why-i-use-safari-instead-of...

skulk 2 days ago | root | parent |

> The point here is, you cannot turn off Tabs in Firefox. You may think that you can, but history proves you wrong. I spent literally years where, each time I upgraded Firefox, I had to spend half an hour searching through the thousands of lines of about:config looking for the newly-added checkbox that I need to un-check -- and then it would only work like 60% of the time anyway, and I'd still end up with tabs.

I ran into this problem and came up with a jank solution: https://github.com/sid-code/tabs-are-windows

It's about 5 lines of code and punts all new tabs into their own windows. I've been using it for a while now and it works, except when you press C-t (my muscle memory for opening new tabs) it doesn't focus the new window's address bar due to the rigamarole of pushing it off into a new window.

ax0ar 17 hours ago | prev | next |

Looks like an Arc alternative, but how trustable is this? I read some comments here mentioning how electron is not very safe. Besides, it's a one man project. Can a browser be a one man business?

alsetmusic 2 days ago | prev | next |

> “Why is there no free trial?”

> We introduced a 14-day free trial once, but it introduced a lot of support and admin, while not growing revenue much. It didn’t make a lot of sense and we removed it, but we might try again in the future.

Well, I'm sorry, but in this landscape (browsers everywhere), you need to demonstrate execution and value to me first. Same reason I won't create an account to test drive the Arc Browser. I'm intrigued, but I'm not giving up a damn thing until I know I'm not getting a pile of garbage.

I say this as someone with many paid licenses and subscriptions.

bachmeier 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

They're saying lots of people try the product and they all conclude it's not worth paying for. Not exactly something that makes me reach for the credit card.

alsetmusic 2 days ago | root | parent |

Thanks for the info. It’s reassuring to hear that I’m not making a mistake and missing out. I’m curious if you can say where you’ve heard this negative feedback? I hadn’t heard of the browser before yesterday.

danpalmer 2 days ago | root | parent | prev |

I agree, I understand the perceived cost of running free trials, but that's just what marketing costs. You can't expect to turn off free trials but retain the same growth. Of course at such a small scale other factors may dominate and they may not notice it holding them back, even if it is.

andai 2 days ago | prev | next |

Has anyone used both Vivaldi and Horse? iirc vertical tabs (with nesting) were one of the main selling points for Vivaldi.

So my natural question when seeing Horse is "how much of this does Vivaldi do” (for free)?

n3storm 2 days ago | prev | next |

I have used for several extended periods of time Min browser to stay focused on docs and spaces:

https://minbrowser.org/

wonger_ 2 days ago | root | parent |

I like Min too. I've been using it for 3 years. The workspace separation is nice, along with the minimal UI. I think it has the best defaults of any browser. Unfortunately, there's a couple uncomfortable quirks and bugs to deal with. I'll probably be switching to Firefox soon and spending lots of time customizing.

wellthisisgreat 2 days ago | prev | next |

So the point is to have hierarchical tables groups?

Aren’t there Firefox / Chrome extensions that do that?

I wouldn’t mind paying a lifetime fee for a better browser, that also seems to align with how I take notes. It’s the support of various obscure web gotchas and things like in-browser visualizations that worry me. I run into issues of some page not loading properly on Firefox and have to fire up Chrome, I imagine for a brand new browser that’d be the case even more so

DecoySalamander 2 days ago | root | parent |

There is a Tree Style Tab addon for Firefox, but it's nowhere near as polished as what's shown in the promo video. There's nothing like this in Chrome, since Chrome doesn't offer access to any browser UI elements beyond a popup over the extension's icon in the navbar. At one point I even tried to do my version of a vertical/hierarchical tab sidebar that would live in an extra tab in the Dev Tools drawer, but had to give up when I realized that there's no way to keep Dev Tools automatically open on every page.

I think it's a cool idea and something I'd buy for 20-60$, but only if it was an addon, not its own standalone browser. Those are too important to get from a tiny startup.

quyleanh 2 days ago | prev | next |

Why don’t we just use Edge? It offers a superior experience with features like vertical tabs, collections, and more.

GoblinSlayer 2 days ago | root | parent | next |

Too much nagging.

wink 2 days ago | root | parent |

I honestly wonder how it would feel to be an "Edge as main browser" person. I open it up every 2 weeks for LinkedIn (too lazy for an extra firefox profile there) and yes, it wants to be my default browser, every second time it also wants me to configure something from MS, or import something or WTF. Barely usable if I have to close 4 dialogs to open a website.

carrychains 2 days ago | root | parent |

I use it as a work main because it's a Microsoft ecosystem with Teams, ADO, SharePoint, etc., and I learned a very long time ago that there are consequences to shunning slices of the Microsoft ecosystem for preference. I spot legit little quality of life integrations occasionally, but on the balance, I have no idea if it has been worth it to deal with some of the bugs and occasionally terrible design decisions that come and go. It's, at least, nice to stay aware and be reminded that my persistently disdainful view of Microsoft over the years actually extends to the poor quality of their recent offerings. I still keep Firefox running for personal browsing. Is this stupid? Maybe. I cannot recommend it.

timeon 2 days ago | root | parent | prev |

Why this chromium flavor in particular? You can have these with Firefox and even Safari has it by default.

quyleanh a day ago | root | parent |

Google services like YouTube and Gmail may not work smoothly with Firefox because Google slows them down. If you don’t use Google services (which most people do), you don’t need to worry.

nopelynopington 2 days ago | prev | next |

I was full of excitement for this when I saw it, until I realised it was a paid product. $60 is a lot to pay for a niche browser. I'm sure someone has built an extension to do this in Firefox or WebKit already

devit 2 days ago | prev | next |

I like the way it works, and I'm experimenting with customizing Firefox to behave like browser.horse.

Currently I did this, which seems to completely mimic what they show in the video:

1. Install Tree Style Tabs. This will give you hierarchical tabs in the sidebar

2. Install Simple Tab Groups. This will let you create multiple separate "tab groups" (aka workspaces) with different sets of tabs.

3. Go to Settings, turn on "Open previous tabs and windows" in General/Startup. This will make Firefox reload your tabs on startup

4. In about:config set browser.tabs.unloadOnLowMemory to true. This will make the browser auto-unload unused tabs so you can have unlimited tabs without running out of memory.

5. In about:config set browser.search.openintab to true. This will make the search bar open search results in a new tab

6. In Tree Style Tabs config set "Promote All Children to parent level always". This will make closing intermediate tabs in the tree work properly (remove the intermediate and reparent all children to the intermediate parent).

7. Install Tampermonkey and add the userscript at the bottom. This will remap click to open a new foreground tab (i.e. original ctrl+shift+click), shift+click to navigate in the current page (i.e. original click) and ctrl+shift+click or shift+middle click to open in a new window (i.e. original shift+click).

Note that the extensions require privileges to access data on all sites, so make sure you trust them or do this on a separate profile or VM.

Compared to browser.horse, this is free and customizable, but might be less optimized, perhaps less featureful and won't automatically get any new feature the browser.horse developers invent.

    // ==UserScript==
    // @name         Click opens in new foreground tab
    // @namespace    http://tampermonkey.net/
    // @version      2024-11-12
    // @description  Click opens in new foreground tab
    // @author       You
    // @match        *://*/\*
    // @grant        none
    // ==/UserScript==

    (function() {
    'use strict';

    function generateRandomId(length) {
        const characters = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789';
        let result = '';
        for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
            result += characters.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * characters.length));
        }
        return result;
    }

    const eventProp = "customClick_" + generateRandomId(32);

    function customClickHandler(event) {
        if (event[eventProp]) {
            //console.log("customClick: recursion " + event);
            return;
        } else {
            //console.log("customClick: first " + event);
        }
        const ctrl = event.button === 1 || (event.ctrlKey && event.button === 0);
        const shift = event.shiftKey;

        let newCtrl = undefined;
        let newShift = undefined;

        //console.log("customClick: detected with " + ctrl + " " + shift);
        if (shift && !ctrl) {
            newCtrl = false;
            newShift = false;
        } else if (shift && ctrl) {
            newCtrl = false;
            newShift = true;
        } else if (!shift && !ctrl) {
            newCtrl = true;
            newShift = true;
        } else { // !shift && ctrl
            return;
        }
        //console.log("customClick: dispatching " + newCtrl + " " + newShift);
        const options = {};
        let source = event;
        while(source) {
            for (const prop of Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source)) {
                options[prop] = event[prop];
            }
            source = Object.getPrototypeOf(source);
        }
        options.button = 0;
        options.ctrlKey = newCtrl;
        options.shiftKey = newShift;

        let newEvent = new PointerEvent('click', options);
        newEvent[eventProp] = true;

        event.preventDefault();
        event.stopPropagation();
        event.target.dispatchEvent(newEvent);
    }
    document.addEventListener('click', customClickHandler, true);
    document.addEventListener('auxclick', customClickHandler, true);
    })();

vdvsvwvwvwvwv 2 days ago | prev | next |

Why not am extension instead? The little animated gif of it looks like it is cool. Not sure I care as Chromes groups solve 80% of this for me. For anything deeper I use Confluence to manage info (Google docs and Notion as well)

precompute 2 days ago | prev | next |

Okay, so pay money to someone to maintain a Chrome fork with a somehow-better treestyletabs? No thank you. This is a ridiculous product that caters to people that can't install a simple browser extension. This is also a huge security risk.

Install firefox, use an extension. Or use brave and its built-in sidebar for tabs.